It is a question with many answers, to which each of us
would answer differently, but I can safely say that we all understood that it
is here, in these kinds of meetings, that major global policies are
voted then brought back home to be implemented.
Some day, it will be us, future
epidemiologists, environmentalists and health advocates, who will design
interventions reflecting policies decided at the WHO, yet specific enough to
the communities we work in to be successful. In other words, the resolutions
and targets decided here will have to be translated into operational
interventions to achieve specific goals.
An example: this year at the world health assembly, one major topic of debate was the reduction by 25% of premature deaths due to non-communicable diseases (NCDs) by 2025.
The NCD alliance was one of the main lobbyists
in this campaign.
Many rejected the initial draft. Thailand, for example, considered that this resolution would
be a burden to the poorest Southeast Asian countries. Denmark, speaking in the name of
the 27 European Union members, wanted to see high cholesterol removed from the
list of diseases.
However, after several days of
rough negotiations, the resolution was finally adopted.
Today, health ministers are back home. The question they are
asking themselves, which is of interest to us MPH students, is:
"What do we do now in our communities to achieve this target?
No comments:
Post a Comment